
0
Under review
Creating wireframes
I don't know maybe it's solved problem, but...
again and again i encounter next problem during wireframes (WF) creating in vizex: i create WF by cross section strings (CSS). For example i have 3 CSS (left, middle, right). I connected two of them (left to middle), validating - ok, no errors. Now i connect next two (middle-right) and one of them (middle) already used in WF creating few seconds ago.
I validating again - and now i have errors like openings which visually equal to middle CSS used in first creating.
I undo, check WF, hide initial middle CSS and connect resulted openings to right CSS, validating. Bingo, no errors! But middle CSS must be equal to openings.
This problem not appear always, but often enough to be annoying. Most often it appear when i creating "pants" - splitting one solid to two, but in simple cases like described above it happens too.
Do anybody have same expirience?
MM 15.0.3, but previous version have same illness
again and again i encounter next problem during wireframes (WF) creating in vizex: i create WF by cross section strings (CSS). For example i have 3 CSS (left, middle, right). I connected two of them (left to middle), validating - ok, no errors. Now i connect next two (middle-right) and one of them (middle) already used in WF creating few seconds ago.
I validating again - and now i have errors like openings which visually equal to middle CSS used in first creating.
I undo, check WF, hide initial middle CSS and connect resulted openings to right CSS, validating. Bingo, no errors! But middle CSS must be equal to openings.
This problem not appear always, but often enough to be annoying. Most often it appear when i creating "pants" - splitting one solid to two, but in simple cases like described above it happens too.
Do anybody have same expirience?
MM 15.0.3, but previous version have same illness
Customer support service by UserEcho
Now I isn't easy to find where the problem located.
That's because i asked about same expirience.
So if we have 3 strings and want to make a Wireframe.
If you click on the Wireframe 1 and then Wireframe 2 it build from 1 to 2.
If you then click on 2 again it in fact close the wireframe, because you have told it to build from wireframe 2 back onto itself.
If you then click on wireframe 3 it build from 2 to 3 but you will have an invalid connection where the closed wireframe insects.
The way to prevent this for now is to not click on string 2 twice.
Or alternatively click in white space to make wireframe build inactive before continuing to build.
However we realise this may be an issue and we will prevent Micromine from being able to do this in the future.
As David mentioned above the trick is not to re-select the active string. If you are still not managing then I would suggest building the wireframe from left to middle (your example) clicking on any white space in your Vizex display (this should deselect your current selection) then building from middle to right. This is somewhat more time consuming as it interrupts the workflow but could serve to check if you are having any other additional problems, i.e. intersecting triangles caused by complex solids etc. which may require tie lines.
Also when creating "pants" you should remember that only a portion of the larger string which the "legs" are being joined to should be selected in the wireframing process for each of the "legs". This is done by clicking and dragging along the string to select on certain vertices for the wireframing process to consider.
Hope you manage to find the answer you are looking for!
I try to make some video, maybe it will be more understandable.
Hopefully we can help you find a solution to your issue!
Не скажу чтобы помогли, но, по крайней мере, не стало хуже :) Советы дельные никому не помешают.
Я постараюсь воспроизвести эту проблему, чтобы было понятно о чем речь. Тут или я один "счастливчик", или я что-то не так делаю.
Initial string for pants:
String is splitted to two parts:
Adding some points to first part and move 1 node of second inside first:
Cut second by first:
Cutted:
Now close them step by step:
And check:
As you can see, two openings which is visually identical to initial strings. Intersections are reaaally small. But i await that these two strings must be absolutely adjacent at break line.